Unit 5 Topic 5.4

The Second Agricultural Revolution

every model, every scale

3 min readfreeNot practiced

In 1750, most people in Britain worked on farms. By 1900, most did not, yet the country ate better than ever. A set of changes in how farms worked, called the Second Agricultural Revolution, made that possible.

What changed

The Second Agricultural Revolution was a period of new farming methods and machines that began in Britain and western Europe in the 1700s and spread to North America in the 1800s. It happened alongside the rise of factories, and each fed the other. Its main changes:

  • Crop rotation. In the old system, a third of the land rested empty each year. In the Norfolk four-field rotation, a farm moved each field through wheat, turnips, barley and clover. Turnips fed animals in winter, and clover added nitrogen to the soil, so no field sat idle.
  • Selective breeding. Farmers such as Robert Bakewell bred sheep and cattle for more meat and wool.
  • Enclosure. Landowners fenced shared village fields and commons into private farms. Larger farms could try new methods, but many small farm families lost their land.
  • New tools and machines. The seed drill (Jethro Tull, 1701) planted seeds in neat rows. The steel plow (John Deere, 1837) cut the tough soils of the US prairies. The horse-drawn reaper (Cyrus McCormick, 1831) cut grain many times faster than workers with hand tools. Replacing human and animal labor with machines is called mechanization.
  • Later inputs. By the late 1800s and early 1900s, railroads and refrigerated cars moved food long distances, and factories made fertilizer. Some textbooks place these at the end of this revolution.
Four fields in a square, linked by arrows that go around in a circle: wheat (grain to sell), then turnips (winter feed for animals), then barley (grain), then clover (grazing that adds nitrogen to the soil), then wheat again. Each year every field moves to the next crop, so no field is left empty and the farm can feed more animals. This rotation spread from Norfolk, England, in the 1700s.
Figure 1. The four-field rotation kept every field producing and fed more animals. LevlPrep original diagram.

Effects: more food, fewer farmers

The revolution changed people and places at several scales.

  • More food from fewer workers. Output per farm worker rose sharply. In the United States, 41% of workers were in farming in 1900 and only 1.9% in 2000 (USDA Economic Research Service, 2005), yet the country grew far more food.
  • Better diets and longer lives. More grain, meat and milk improved nutrition. Death rates fell, which helped Britain's population grow quickly: in the language of the demographic transition model, the change helped move Britain into stage 2.
  • People moved to towns. Machines and enclosure meant farms needed fewer hands. Rural families moved to towns and cities, where growing factories needed workers. Fewer farm jobs pushed people from the countryside; factory jobs pulled them to towns.
  • Bigger, more specialized farms. Farmers who could buy machines worked more land and grew more for sale. Those who could not often sold out.
Before (early 1700s, England)After (late 1800s, England and the US)
Field useOne field in three left empty each yearRotation keeps every field producing
PowerPeople, oxen, horsesHorse-drawn machines, then steam and early tractors
Who farmsMost of the populationA shrinking share of workers
Where people liveMostly villagesA growing share in towns and cities

Reading the change at different scales

At the national scale, Britain's share of farm workers fell for more than a century. Inside Britain, at the local (subnational) scale, change was uneven: grain lands that could use reapers mechanized first, while hilly areas changed more slowly. At the global scale, most farmers in Asia, Africa and Latin America did not use these machines until the 1900s, and many small farms still rely mostly on hand labor. The Second Agricultural Revolution was a change in some places, not everywhere at once.

Spot a mistake on this page?