Unit 8 · Topic 8.8 Beta

Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification

3 min read · freeNot practiced

Some pollutants are harmless at the concentration you find in the water, yet deadly at the top of the food chain. Two processes explain how they get concentrated: one happens inside a single organism, the other happens between trophic levels.

Bioaccumulation: inside one organism

Bioaccumulation is the build-up of a substance in one organism over its life. If an organism takes in a substance faster than it can break it down or get rid of it, the amount in its body keeps rising. Older, larger fish of the same species therefore carry more mercury than younger ones. The substances that do this are persistent (they are not broken down) and fat-soluble (they are stored in fat instead of being excreted in urine).

Biomagnification: up the food chain

A food chain drawn as a column of levels: water, phytoplankton, zooplankton, small fish, large fish and an osprey at the top. Dots representing a pesticide become denser at each level, and the concentration labels rise from 0.00005 ppm in the water to 50 ppm in the osprey (invented values). A side panel shows bioaccumulation: one fish whose mercury rises with age.
Figure 1. The same pesticide at each level of a lake food chain (invented values). LevlPrep original diagram.

Biomagnification is the rise in concentration at each higher trophic level. A small fish eats thousands of zooplankton and keeps the pesticide from all of them. Most of the food's mass is used for energy and lost (recall the 10% rule), but the pesticide stays behind in fat. A large fish eats many small fish, and an osprey eats many large fish, so the concentration multiplies at each step.

BioaccumulationBiomagnification
Wherewithin one organismacross trophic levels
Over whatthe organism's lifetimethe steps of a food chain
Evidenceolder or larger individuals have higher levelspredators have higher levels than their prey

Calculating it

Worked example: concentration three levels up. A pesticide is 0.02 ppm in zooplankton and increases tenfold at each step. What is it in a bird three levels higher?

Setup: 0.02ppm×10×10×100.02\,\text{ppm} \times 10 \times 10 \times 10. Answer: =20ppm= 20\,\text{ppm}, a thousand times the zooplankton level.

Worked example: how many times greater? An osprey holds 50 ppm and the lake water 0.00005 ppm. Setup: 50ppm0.00005ppm\frac{50\,\text{ppm}}{0.00005\,\text{ppm}}. Answer: =1,000,000= 1{,}000{,}000 times, which is one million or 10610^{6}.

Reading the data

A table of concentrations up a food chain shows biomagnification; a table of one species by age or size shows bioaccumulation. To compare levels, divide the higher concentration by the lower one to get "how many times" greater. Watch the decimal places with very small numbers: 0.00005 ppm is 5×10−55 \times 10^{-5} ppm, so a level of 50 ppm is a million times higher. Then explain the pattern: the substance is persistent and fat-soluble, so it is kept, not broken down or excreted.

The real cases

DDT biomagnified in fish-eating birds such as bald eagles, ospreys, peregrine falcons and brown pelicans. It interfered with calcium in eggshell formation, so eggs broke. After the United States banned DDT in 1972, these birds recovered. Methylmercury is the main concern today. Mercury released by burning coal, small-scale gold mining and other sources (worldwide, small-scale gold mining is the largest human source and coal burning the second, according to the UN Environment Programme) falls into lakes and oceans, where bacteria convert it to methylmercury. It reaches the highest levels in long-lived predatory fish such as swordfish, shark, king mackerel and large tuna. Because it harms the developing brain, pregnant people and children are advised to limit those fish and choose smaller ones such as sardines and salmon.

Spot a mistake on this page?