The graphical FTC question is a free-response regular: a graph of built from lines and semicircles, and a function
Signed area
A Riemann sum multiplies each width by a height. Where is negative, the heights are negative, so those products are negative. In the limit, a definite integral counts regions below the axis as negative:
= (area above the x-axis) minus (area below the x-axis)
This is the signed area. On the graph of has one arch above the axis and an identical arch below, so
Values of g from areas
Worked example 1. In the figure, is a segment from to , a semicircle of radius 2 below the axis from 2 to 6, and a segment from to . Let
: triangle above, .
: add the half-disc below, . So .
: add the triangle above, . So .
Two classic slips: using the area of the whole disc () for a half, and adding a region below the axis instead of subtracting it.
Where g increases, decreases and has extrema
Because , read the sign of f:
- : is increasing (area is being added).
- : is decreasing (area is being subtracted).
- changes from positive to negative at : has a relative maximum at . From negative to positive: a relative minimum.
In the figure, changes from positive to negative at (relative maximum of ) and from negative to positive at (relative minimum). A zero of without a sign change, like at , gives no extremum: just pauses and keeps going.
Concavity and inflection points
Because , read whether f is rising or falling:
- increasing: concave up. decreasing: concave down.
- changes from increasing to decreasing (or back) at : has a point of inflection at .
In the figure, decreases on and increases on , so has its inflection point at , the bottom of the semicircle. Not at 2 or 6, where : those are the extrema. Mixing up the two is the most common error on this question.
| On the graph of f | Means for g |
|---|---|
| above the axis | g increasing |
| crosses from above to below at c | relative maximum at c |
| rising | g concave up |
| turns from rising to falling at c | inflection point at c |
| signed area from a to x | the value g(x) |
Absolute extrema: the candidates test
A relative maximum need not be the largest value on the whole interval. To find the absolute maximum or minimum of on , list the candidates: both endpoints and every place changes sign. Compute at each and compare.
Worked example 2. For the in the figure, on : , , , .
Absolute maximum: 2, at . Absolute minimum: , at .
Writing the justification
Name the function and the change: " changes from positive to negative at , so has a relative maximum there." Sentences such as "it goes up then down" or "the slope changes sign" do not say which function and earn nothing. For an inflection point: " changes sign at because changes from decreasing to increasing there."