Unit 5 · Topic 5.8 Beta

Reaction Mechanism and Rate Law

3 min read · freeNot practiced

A mechanism (topic 5.7) is a proposal. The strongest test is to ask what rate law it predicts and compare that with the rate law measured in the lab. This topic shows how to get the predicted rate law when the first step is the slow one.

The slowest step sets the pace

Think of a line of people passing buckets of water: the line moves only as fast as its slowest person. A reaction mechanism is the same. The slowest elementary step is the rate-determining step. The overall reaction cannot go faster than it, and speeding up any of the fast steps changes nothing.

A two-stage assembly line drawn as two pipes in a row. The first pipe is narrow and labeled step 1, slow; the second pipe is wide and labeled step 2, fast. Product leaves the end only as fast as material squeezes through the narrow first pipe, so the overall rate equals the rate of the slow step, and making the fast step faster changes nothing.
Figure 1. The overall rate is the rate of the slow step, however fast the other steps are. LevlPrep original diagram.

When the first step is slow

If the first step is rate-determining, the overall rate law is simply that step's rate law. Because the step is elementary, you write it from its coefficients (topic 5.4).

  • Species that react only in later, fast steps do not appear in the rate law. That is how a reactant can be zero order.
  • The rate law is in terms of reactants only, because the slow first step involves only reactants.

Worked example: predicting a rate law and testing a mechanism

Overall: NO₂(g) + CO(g) → NO(g) + CO₂(g). Measured rate law: rate = k[NO₂]².

Mechanism A: one step, NO₂ + CO → NO + CO₂. Predicted: rate = k[NO₂][CO]. This does not match: the data say CO is zero order. Rejected.

Mechanism B: (1) NO₂ + NO₂ → NO₃ + NO (slow); (2) NO₃ + CO → NO₂ + CO₂ (fast).

Sum: 2 NO₂ + NO₃ + CO → NO₃ + NO + NO₂ + CO₂. Cancel NO₃ and one NO₂: NO₂ + CO → NO + CO₂. ✓

Predicted rate law: from the slow step, rate = k[NO₂]². ✓ It matches. Mechanism B is consistent with the data (not proven).

Three tests for a mechanism

Checking a proposed mechanism
TestHow
SumAdd the steps and cancel; the result must be the overall equation.
Reasonable stepsEach step is uni- or bimolecular (rarely termolecular).
Rate lawThe rate law predicted from the slow step must match the measured one.

Two different mechanisms can both pass every test. Data can rule a mechanism out, but they can never prove one is right. In your justifications, say the mechanism is "consistent with" the data.

Why the fast steps drop out

Suppose step 1 makes an intermediate slowly and step 2 uses it quickly. As soon as a particle of intermediate forms, step 2 grabs it. So step 2 can never run faster than step 1 feeds it, and the overall rate is the rate of step 1. If you add more of a reactant that is used only in step 2, step 2 just waits more often: nothing speeds up. That is why such a reactant is zero order.

For the same reason, products form at a rate set by the slow step, and the intermediate stays at a very low concentration throughout.

A common slip

Do not write the rate law from the coefficients of the overall equation. In the example, the overall equation would suggest rate = k[NO₂][CO], which is wrong. Only an elementary step, here the slow one, can be read that way.

Spot a mistake on this page?