You now know every antidifferentiation technique on the BC exam: the basic rules, substitution, long division, completing the square, integration by parts and linear partial fractions. The hard part is no longer doing them; it is recognizing which one an integral wants. This page gives a reliable order of questions, then practice with the look-alikes that trip students up.
Ask the questions in order
- Is it a basic form, or a sum of them after rewriting? Rewrite roots as powers (
), expand products, and split a fraction whose bottom is a single term (). - Is there an inside function whose derivative is also a factor? Then substitute: with . A constant factor can be fixed; a missing variable factor cannot.
- Is it a fraction whose top has degree at least the bottom's? Divide first:
. - Is it a constant over a quadratic with no real zeros? Complete the square and use
. - Is it a product with one factor that gets simpler when differentiated? Use integration by parts: with , . A logarithm or an inverse trigonometric function goes in .
- Does the bottom factor into distinct linear factors? Use linear partial fractions:
. Divide first if the top's degree is not below the bottom's.
Then check by differentiating. It takes ten seconds and catches sign errors and missing factors.
Look-alikes
Small changes in an integrand change the method completely. Compare:
| Integral | Method | Result |
|---|---|---|
| basic (arctan) | ||
| substitution, | ||
| division | ||
| substitution, | ||
| substitution, | ||
| none: no elementary antiderivative | a calculator for definite integrals | |
| integration by parts, | ||
| linear partial fractions |
Worked example 1. Find .
Basic? No: a product. Inside function: , with derivative 1, so and . But an extra remains. Write it in terms of : .
Back to :
Reading someone else's work
The exam sometimes shows work and asks you to find the error. Check each line against its rule: Is right? Does the constant factor match? Were the limits changed? Is the antiderivative right (differentiate it)? In , writing keeps the -limits; the correct line is
Try substitution and rewriting before integration by parts or partial fractions: they are quicker when they work. An infinite limit of integration, or an integrand that blows up on the interval, makes the integral improper (6.13): write it as a limit before integrating.