Unit 1 · 5 to 10% of the exam
Unit 1 practice test: Basic Economic Concepts
twelve questions, every option explained
12 exam-style questions from the unit, free, with an explanation for every option. Most are multiple choice, as on the real exam; a few ask for a number or have you shift a curve on a graph, and sets share one data table, graph or scenario. Covers: Scarcity; Opportunity Cost and the Production Possibilities Curve (PPC); Comparative Advantage and Gains from Trade; Demand; Supply; Market Equilibrium, Disequilibrium, and Changes in Equilibrium.
Data
Tables and chairs: hours per unit
| Country | Hours per table | Hours per chair |
|---|---|---|
| Ellis | 2 | 1 |
| Fenwick | 6 | 2 |
1. Which country has the absolute advantage in chairs?
- Fenwick, because it needs more hours per chair
- Ellis, because it needs 1 hour per chair to Fenwick's 2
- Fenwick, because it has the lower opportunity cost of chairs
- Neither, because both need hours to make chairs
Show the answer
With input data, the absolute advantage goes to whoever needs fewer resources per unit: 1 hour beats 2.
- Fenwick, because it needs more hours per chair: More hours per unit means less efficient, not more.
- Correct: Ellis, because it needs 1 hour per chair to Fenwick's 2: Right: fewer hours per chair.
- Fenwick, because it has the lower opportunity cost of chairs: Lower opportunity cost is comparative advantage, not absolute advantage.
- Neither, because both need hours to make chairs: Absolute advantage compares the hours needed, and Ellis needs fewer.
2. Which country has the comparative advantage in chairs?
- Fenwick, because a chair costs it a third of a table and costs Ellis half a table
- Ellis, because it needs fewer hours per chair than Fenwick
- Ellis, because it is faster at making both goods
- Fenwick, because it needs more hours to make a table
Show the answer
A chair costs Ellis of a table and Fenwick , a third of a table, so Fenwick has the lower opportunity cost.
- Correct: Fenwick, because a chair costs it a third of a table and costs Ellis half a table: Right: a third of a table is less than half.
- Ellis, because it needs fewer hours per chair than Fenwick: Fewer hours per chair is absolute advantage.
- Ellis, because it is faster at making both goods: Being faster at both gives Ellis the absolute advantage in both, not the comparative advantage in both.
- Fenwick, because it needs more hours to make a table: Hours per table alone do not give the cost of a chair.
3. A student says, "Ellis needs fewer hours for both goods, so trade with Fenwick cannot help Ellis." What is wrong with the claim?
- Nothing: a country with the absolute advantage in both goods gains nothing from trading with others
- Ellis gains if Fenwick also has an absolute advantage in something
- Trade helps Ellis if it switches to making chairs
- Ellis gains by making tables and buying chairs at a price below its own opportunity cost
Show the answer
Gains from trade come from comparative advantage. Ellis gives up 2 chairs per table; if it can get a chair for less than half a table from Fenwick, it ends up with more of both.
- Nothing: a country with the absolute advantage in both goods gains nothing from trading with others: Both sides can gain whenever their opportunity costs differ.
- Ellis gains if Fenwick also has an absolute advantage in something: Absolute advantage is not needed for gains from trade.
- Trade helps Ellis if it switches to making chairs: Ellis's comparative advantage is in tables, so it gains by making tables.
- Correct: Ellis gains by making tables and buying chairs at a price below its own opportunity cost: Right: comparative advantage, not absolute advantage, drives the gains.
Scenario
A year in Hollis's electric scooter market
Hollis is an invented city where many people rent electric scooters by the ride. Over one year: (1) the price of gasoline jumps, making car trips more expensive; (2) a new university campus opens, bringing 10,000 students to the city; (3) the scooter company announces that ride prices will drop sharply next month; (4) the scooter company raises its own price per ride from $3 to $4.
4. Event (1): gasoline prices jump. What happens to the demand for scooter rides in Hollis?
- It decreases, because gasoline and scooter rides are complements for riders
- The quantity demanded rises along the same curve
- It increases, because scooter rides are a substitute for car trips
- It does not change, because scooters do not use gasoline
Show the answer
When car trips cost more, some riders switch to scooters, a substitute: demand for scooter rides shifts right.
- It decreases, because gasoline and scooter rides are complements for riders: Complements are used together; scooters replace car trips instead.
- The quantity demanded rises along the same curve: The scooter price did not change, so this is a shift, not a movement.
- Correct: It increases, because scooter rides are a substitute for car trips: Right: a dearer substitute raises demand.
- It does not change, because scooters do not use gasoline: The link is through car trips, which compete with scooter rides.
5. Event (2): 10,000 students arrive. How does this affect the scooter market?
- Demand decreases, because students have low incomes
- Demand increases, because there are more buyers
- Supply increases, because more scooters are needed
- Quantity demanded rises because the price falls
Show the answer
The number of buyers is a determinant of demand: more buyers shift demand right.
- Demand decreases, because students have low incomes: Even students with low incomes add riders the market did not have.
- Correct: Demand increases, because there are more buyers: Right: more buyers, more rides wanted at every price.
- Supply increases, because more scooters are needed: The scenario is about riders, the buyers; it says nothing about scooter makers.
- Quantity demanded rises because the price falls: No price change is described for this event.
6. Event (3): riders learn that ride prices will drop sharply next month. What happens to demand for rides this month?
- It decreases, because riders wait for the lower price
- It increases, because riders expect a bargain
- It is unchanged until the price of a ride actually falls
- The quantity demanded rises along the curve
Show the answer
Expectations are a determinant of demand. Expecting a lower price soon, buyers put off rides now: today's demand shifts left.
- Correct: It decreases, because riders wait for the lower price: Right: buyers delay purchases until the price falls.
- It increases, because riders expect a bargain: The bargain is next month, so buyers wait for it.
- It is unchanged until the price of a ride actually falls: Expectations shift demand before the price changes.
- The quantity demanded rises along the curve: The price has not changed yet, so there is no movement along the curve.
7. Event (4): the company raises its own ride price from $3 to $4. How does the graph of the scooter market show this?
- A shift of the demand curve to the left
- A shift of the demand curve to the right
- A movement down along the demand curve to a larger quantity demanded
- A movement up along the demand curve to a smaller quantity demanded
Show the answer
The good's own price is on the vertical axis, so a higher price moves riders up along the same demand curve.
- A shift of the demand curve to the left: The ride price is on the axis, so it does not shift demand.
- A shift of the demand curve to the right: A higher price does not raise demand; it lowers the quantity demanded.
- A movement down along the demand curve to a larger quantity demanded: Down along the curve would be a lower price.
- Correct: A movement up along the demand curve to a smaller quantity demanded: Right: a movement along the curve.
8. A country discovers a large new field of natural gas. Which factor of production has it gained more of?
- Labor
- Land
- Capital
- Entrepreneurship
Show the answer
Natural resources count as land in economics.
- Labor: Labor is human effort; no workers were added.
- Correct: Land: Right: natural resources are land.
- Capital: Capital is made goods; the gas is natural.
- Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurship is organizing and risk-taking; nothing here adds it.
9. Why must mutually beneficial terms of trade lie between the two countries' opportunity costs?
- The richer country sets the price
- Prices in trade are set at the exact average of the two costs
- Countries trade goods they are unable to make
- Each country must get a good for less than it costs to make at home
Show the answer
A country buys a good from abroad only if it pays less than its own opportunity cost, and sells only if it receives more than its own; both conditions hold only between the two costs.
- The richer country sets the price: Wealth does not set the terms; the opportunity costs do.
- Prices in trade are set at the exact average of the two costs: Any price between the costs works; the average is one choice.
- Countries trade goods they are unable to make: Countries often trade goods they could make, as the examples show.
- Correct: Each country must get a good for less than it costs to make at home: Right: both must beat their own opportunity cost.
10. In Marnovia one worker makes 24 shirts or 8 hats a day. Marnovia trades for hats at 1 hat for 2.5 shirts. How many shirts does Marnovia save on each hat it buys instead of making it?
Type a number. A four-function calculator is allowed, as on the exam.
Show the answer
Making a hat costs Marnovia shirts; buying one costs 2.5 shirts, so Marnovia saves shirt per hat.
- Answer: 0.5
11. Which is a service rather than a good?
- A pair of scissors
- A bottle of shampoo
- A haircut
- A barber's chair
Show the answer
A service is an action done for someone; a good is a physical item.
- A pair of scissors: Scissors are a good (and capital for a barber).
- A bottle of shampoo: Shampoo is a good.
- Correct: A haircut: Right: the haircut is work done for you.
- A barber's chair: The chair is a good (and capital for a barber).
12. Jordan's Saturday options, in order of preference, are a hike with friends, a paid work shift worth $80, and studying. If Jordan goes on the hike, what is the opportunity cost?
- The work shift and the studying, added together
- Nothing, because the hike is free
- The studying, because it ranks last
- The $80 work shift, the next-best choice
Show the answer
Opportunity cost is the value of the next-best alternative given up, here the work shift. Jordan could not have done both other options with the same time.
- The work shift and the studying, added together: Jordan could have done only one of the other two, so only the best of them counts.
- Nothing, because the hike is free: Even a free activity costs the time that could have earned $80.
- The studying, because it ranks last: The lowest-ranked option is not what Jordan would have done instead.
- Correct: The $80 work shift, the next-best choice: Right: only the next-best option counts.