Estimating Area with Riemann Sums
A Riemann sum estimates accumulated change by adding width times height over subintervals; a trapezoidal sum averages the two end heights.
Part 1 · Hook
Why this matters
Part 2 · Before you start
What this builds on
Part 3 · Prerequisite check
Quick check before you start
1. Water flows at a constant 30 liters per minute for 4 minutes. How much water flows?
- 120 liters
- 34 liters
- 7.5 liters
- 30 liters
Show the answer
Rate times time is the area of a rectangle under the rate graph: 30 times 4.
- Correct: 120 liters:
- 34 liters:
- 7.5 liters:
- 30 liters:
2. If on , where on is smallest?
- at
- at
- in the middle
- it depends on the concavity
Show the answer
means is increasing, so its smallest value on the interval is at the left end.
- Correct: at :
- at :
- in the middle:
- it depends on the concavity:
3. The graph of is concave down. Where does a chord between two points of the graph lie?
- below the graph
- above the graph
- on the graph
- it depends on the slope
Show the answer
A concave down graph bends downward, so it bulges above every chord.
- Correct: below the graph:
- above the graph:
- on the graph:
- it depends on the slope:
Part 4 · See it
See it first
Part 5 · Step by step
How it works, step by step
- You only know a rate at a few timestreat it as roughly constant on each subinterval and add up width times height
- The table has times 0, 1, 3, 4, 7the widths are 1, 2, 1 and 3; each product uses its own width
- The function is increasing on the intervalleft ends give the smallest heights, so a left sum underestimates and a right sum overestimates
- The graph is concave upchords lie above the graph, so a trapezoidal sum overestimates
Part 6 · Key ideas
Key ideas
- A Riemann sum adds (width) times (height) over the subintervals: left, right or midpoint heights.
- A trapezoidal sum uses width times the average of the two end heights; it equals (left + right) / 2.
- From a table, each width is the difference of two times. Never assume equal widths.
- Increasing function: left sum under, right sum over. Decreasing: the reverse. Concave up: trapezoid over, midpoint under.
Part 7 · Misconception
A common mistake
The wrong idea: With 4 subintervals on , every width is .
What actually happens: Only when the subintervals are equal. A table with times 0, 1, 3, 4, 7 has widths 1, 2, 1 and 3, and each product must use its own width.
Part 8 · Check yourself
Check yourself
Exam-style questions. Anything you miss goes into your review queue.
Table
Rainwater flowing into a tank
| (hours) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (gallons per hour) | 20 | 26 | 30 | 35 | 41 |
1. Use a left Riemann sum with the four subintervals indicated by the table to estimate the gallons of rainwater that flow into the tank from to .
No calculator. Type the exact value (a fraction, π, e or a root is fine), then its unit.
Show the answer
Left sum:
- Answer: 207 gallons
2. Which expression is the right Riemann sum with the four subintervals indicated by the table?
Show the answer
Widths: , , , . Right ends: , , , . Right sum
- : These heights are the rates at the left ends, so this is the left Riemann sum.
: The widths are not equal. Using 7/4 for every width ignores the table: the widths are 1, 2, 1 and 3. - : These multipliers are the times t, not the widths of the subintervals. A width is a difference of two times.
- Correct: : Correct: each width times the rate at the right end of that subinterval.
3. Use a trapezoidal sum with the four subintervals indicated by the table to estimate the gallons of rainwater that flow into the tank from to .
No calculator. Type the exact value (a fraction, π, e or a root is fine), then its unit.
Show the answer
- Answer: 225.5 gallons
4. Is the left Riemann sum of 207 gallons an overestimate or an underestimate of the water that flows in, and why?
- An overestimate, because the rates in the table are positive
- An underestimate, because R is increasing on each subinterval
- An overestimate, because R is increasing on each subinterval
- An underestimate, because the subintervals have unequal widths
Show the answer
Because is increasing, on each subinterval is smallest at the left end. Every left rectangle lies below the graph, so the left sum underestimates.
- An overestimate, because the rates in the table are positive: Positive rates make the amount grow, but they say nothing about whether rectangles are too tall or too short.
- Correct: An underestimate, because R is increasing on each subinterval: Correct: the left end has the smallest rate on each subinterval, so each rectangle is too short.
- An overestimate, because R is increasing on each subinterval: For an increasing rate the left end has the smallest value on each subinterval, so the rectangles fall short.
- An underestimate, because the subintervals have unequal widths: Unequal widths do not decide the direction; the monotonicity of R does.
5. For which function is a right Riemann sum on sure to be an overestimate of the area under its graph?
- a positive function that is increasing on [1, 4]
- a positive function that is decreasing on [1, 4]
- a positive function that is concave down on [1, 4]
- a positive function with a maximum at x = 2.5
Show the answer
If is increasing, the right end of each subinterval gives the largest value of on it. Each rectangle covers its piece of the region and more, so the right sum is an overestimate.
- Correct: a positive function that is increasing on [1, 4]: Correct: the right end has the largest value on each subinterval, so every rectangle is too tall.
- a positive function that is decreasing on [1, 4]: Then the right end has the smallest value on each subinterval: a right sum underestimates.
- a positive function that is concave down on [1, 4]: Concavity decides trapezoids and midpoints. For right sums the deciding fact is whether f increases or decreases.
- a positive function with a maximum at x = 2.5: Such a function rises and then falls, so some right rectangles are too tall and some too short: no conclusion.
6. A function has , and . What is the trapezoidal sum for on with the subintervals and ?
- 39
- 32.5
- 31.25
- 65
Show the answer
- 39: This is the right Riemann sum, 2(6) + 3(9).
- Correct: 32.5: Correct: 2 times 5 plus 3 times 7.5.
- 31.25: This uses the equal-width rule with width 2.5. The subintervals here have widths 2 and 3.
- 65: This forgets to halve: a trapezoid uses the average of its two heights.
Part 9 · Summary
Summary
Part 10 · Up next
What comes next
Part 11 · Connections